Hi, > Ah sorry I got it now. I does apply but I will have to create these > MatchMaker objects into Ip2. Bruno, since it is your code, what do you > prefer? You said you would like to keep only flags in the functor.
By "only flags", I meant no physical parameters. Previous Vaclav's proposal is on the same line : parameters in bodies, translation into interaction physics in functor using matchmakers (matchmaker are not a physical parameters, more sub-functors). So, I have no objection of principle. I have a few reserves however. In my experience, the more advanced functionalities are used, the more it will need me time to maintain the code. It is also more difficult for one reading the code. So, please Chiara, don't do that if you don't really need it (i.e. if you don't plan to test dozens of averaging formula), and better keep the hardcoded harmonic average we have now. Cheers. Bruno _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
