Question #239900 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/239900
Status: Answered => Open
Raphaël Maurin is still having a problem:
I thought again at the problem, and I think we should stay consistent with the
formulation cn = cn1cn2/(cn1 + cn2) all along. Because, if we make an exception
for cn1 or cn2 = 0, the behavior will not be continue in a way. Think for
example at keeping cn2 at a certain value and reducing slowly cn1 until 0, you
have a discontinuity in the behavior at 0 which is not consistent. It is just a
matter of being consistent, so, I think it is good to change and apply also the
formulation cn = cn1cn2/(cn1 + cn2) at zero , and if nobody disagree I am going
to do it.
Raphael
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
