New question #249830 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/249830

HI all,

I did some simulations using kinemCNDEngine, but I have got a strange result 
concerning the stress tensor shear components. Since I presume that this engine 
performs a symetrical loading with respect to vertical and horizontal walls, I 
was expecting a symetrical stress tensor with equal values of shear components 
(tho12 and tho21).

To comupte the stress tensor within the sample (2D sample), I used the 
getStress function (Love-Weber formula).

It returns something like this:
[s1  tho  0
  ~0    s2    0
 0    0      0  ]

I don't understand why tho21 is equal or tends to zero?

In order to avoid that, I have applied the same engine twice  on both left 
upper corner horizontally and to the right lower corner vertically upwards. 
Should it be done like this on this case? I'm affraid this may not be a simple 
shear test anymore. Am I right?


I am using kinemCNDEngine with rigid frictionless walls- does it still working 
under such conditions or should I have periodic boundaries or add friction to 
my rigid walls?

The same problem persists  considering a square specimen because I was thinking 
that the difference in shear components values may be related to the 
rectangular geometry of my specimen. Is it impacted by the geometry or walls 
friction?

Besides I need some clarifications to understand exactly how does this engine 
work:
the upper plate moves horizontally and the vertical plates follow, but:
  - Can the upper and bottom plate move vertically?
  - Is the point (2D)/the line (3D) joining the vertical and the upper plate 
still the same during the test?

Thank you 

Cyndie

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to