Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Status: Answered => Open
Alexander is still having a problem:
Hello Bruno and Jan, thank's a lot for answers.
So questions specially for you Bruno.
> well, but in *my opinion* "bonded particle model" equals particle model,
> that supports cohesion. Maybe you can ask another question concerning
> cohesive models and also other poeple (not confused by CpmMat in question
> title) would give their opinions :-)
Do you agree with Jan that in general "bonded particle model" equals
particle model, that supports cohesion?
Is it possible to use Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment for
modeling damages (e.g. break on tension) for metallic and composite
materials?
with best regards Alexander
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
