Public bug reported: Dear all, sorry for this confusion:
By my test, an instance attaches interface/disk over than the max config num_pcie_ports in arm, from [1], I know that the max of that config num_pcie_ports=28 is limited by QEMU, however, the number of PCIs attached on my instance has far exceeded this limit. Does nova limitation num_pcie_ports=28 need to update to a larger number? Could anyone give me some advice? [1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c199becf52267ba37c5191f6f82e29bb5232b607/nova/conf/libvirt.py#L809 My Openstack Version: W Libvirt Version: 8.0.0 Qemu Version: 6.2.0 ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061346 Title: Does nova really need to limit number of pcie port to 28? Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: Dear all, sorry for this confusion: By my test, an instance attaches interface/disk over than the max config num_pcie_ports in arm, from [1], I know that the max of that config num_pcie_ports=28 is limited by QEMU, however, the number of PCIs attached on my instance has far exceeded this limit. Does nova limitation num_pcie_ports=28 need to update to a larger number? Could anyone give me some advice? [1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c199becf52267ba37c5191f6f82e29bb5232b607/nova/conf/libvirt.py#L809 My Openstack Version: W Libvirt Version: 8.0.0 Qemu Version: 6.2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2061346/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
