Hi Kathy,
My name is Marlena and I am new to this group I have been observing a few of
the emails since last night it is very hard for me to just jump in on a
conversation that I have no clue what you all are talking about so with that in
mind when is the topic of conversation going to change or should I move on to
another group. Thank you for listening.
kathy kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rick,
I never said this was not the place for that discussion about law
enforcement on internet.
All i said on that subject was what I knew, if you disagree with that then
maybe you need to
see your local law enforcement official, because i know I told the truth.
Disagree all you like
your still wrong. What I did say I thought didn't belong here was the IDLE
chat, that is for messenger not this group. I think this is not how you
understood it sir. I didn't say everything i know about the stalker on internet
issue because my brother and father asked me not to tell secrets on how they
catch ppl breaking the law. Kinda like not to give away all of thier
techniques. But the issue of this not being the place to start a chat
conversation is an issue others before me have covered too. WE need to keep the
group on the issues of yahoo messenger not chatting about dinner last night or
what your name is or circumstances that is
stuff for yahoo messenger.
Kathy
----- Original Message ----
From: Rick Rudge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 7:41:01 AM
Subject: [Y!M] Re: ?
I sort of disagree, Kathy. [Y!M] is a group that talks about Yahoo! Instant
Messenger and all issues of IMing. It can be about the newest Y!M update,
or about Y!M for Windows, the Mac and Linux, or about trying to get it to
work, or about important issues that people who use Instant Messaging
may have to deal with. I don't see any problems discussing this whole
sexual predator law since really this deals with IMing too.
I also disagree with Linda. Most kids are IMing with their friends who they
know or want to know (Sam from study hall, might get your Y!M nickname)
and not complete strangers who everybody is fearful of. Very few people
seem to be actively wanting to chat with complete strangers, and then it's
only to be just friends or pen pals.
Guys are just as clueless as the unsuspecting older women who just want
to find companionship. I don't know how many Nigerian women who have
wanted me to cash checks for them. :-) That's just one of the things that
you need to always be cautious about when IMing with strangers.
I think that this discussion is perfectly relevant to this group.
--Rick
--- In Yahoo_Messenger@ yahoogroups. com, Larry Schreiber <indycoltsfan1945@
...>
wrote:
>
> Kathy U are so right!!!!!
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: kathy kendall <lil_lady_dreaming_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] .>
> To: Yahoo_Messenger@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 4:59:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Y!M] Re: ?
>
> I'm not sure but I always thought that yahoo messenger was for chatting? And
> this
group
> keeps you updated on new and exciting things to use in doing it. In other
> words we
should
> keep messenger on messenger and the group dealings here. Just so everyone is
> happy.
>
> Kathy
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Linda <linda_jeanne@ yahoo.com>
> To: Yahoo_Messenger@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 2:43:17 PM
> Subject: [Y!M] Re: ?
>
>
> I wish people who want to chat would just direct the reply to the
> person intended instead of the entire group.
>
> And you are right, you can't trust anyone on here. I am beginning to
> think the majority of the people who respond to IM's are up to no
> good. Just too bad kids can't see that. Same goes for unsuspecting
> older women who just want to find companionship. Usually all they
> find is their empty bank accounts.
>
> Linda
>
> --- In Yahoo_Messenger@ yahoogroups. com, "Rick Rudge" <rickrudge@ ..>
> wrote:
> >
> > People like Kateja Simpson, who hangs out here all the time, are
> always trying to chat with
> > people, but then you find out that they're only 14 years old, and
> you just back away. I can
> > see where people can really get caught in this trap.
> >
> > On the other hand, I see these horn-dog sexual predators taking
> advantage of that too. I
> > don't like the idea of guys taking advantage of young girls who are
> naive and susceptible to
> > getting themselves into trouble.
> >
> > That 30 year old guy who says he's only 12 or 14 years old wanting
> to hook up, is no
> > different from that 14 year old girl who is really a 50 year old
> cop trying to entrap you. You
> > just can't trust anybody on the Internet. It's better to just stay
> friends and keep it casual.
> >
> > --Rick
> >
> > --- In Yahoo_Messenger@ yahoogroups. com, "gibsod34" <gibsod34@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > What does anyone no about these Internet stalking laws were
> police
> > > officers poss as young girls get you to chat then arrest you.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who
> knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers. yahoo.com/ dir/?link= list&sid= 396545433
>
---------------------------------
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
