-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Lars Eggert wrote:
...
>> My suggestion would be to add a section to that draft grandfathering
>> ports 465, 993, 2000 and a few more (adding as much negative verbiage as
>> seems wise; I don't think the exact amount makes any difference at all).
>> IIRC port 2000 can be grandfathered a half-dozen times.
There are two separate issues:
- - previous assignments that don't follow the proposed recommendations
- as noted, there's no goal to fix that
- - 'squatting', or use of ports without registering through IANA
- IMO, these should not be ignored, but clearly cannot be
treated as equivalent to 'self assigned'
i.e., IMO, IANA should list these as "unauthorized use",
as a service to the community to help those using those
ports as assigned.
I would expect the draft might address both issues.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAktXHUgACgkQE5f5cImnZrur0wCgrEKpARNefyRROwqpZSLeS39H
JlYAoPcevBtqqK0fW4kmR41xVKPqATm8
=VHin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
