On 2010-1-20, at 17:12, Joe Touch wrote: > Lars Eggert wrote: > ... >>> My suggestion would be to add a section to that draft grandfathering >>> ports 465, 993, 2000 and a few more (adding as much negative verbiage as >>> seems wise; I don't think the exact amount makes any difference at all). >>> IIRC port 2000 can be grandfathered a half-dozen times.
Just to be clear - it wasn't me who wrote what you're quoting... Lars > > There are two separate issues: > > - - previous assignments that don't follow the proposed recommendations > - as noted, there's no goal to fix that > > - - 'squatting', or use of ports without registering through IANA > - IMO, these should not be ignored, but clearly cannot be > treated as equivalent to 'self assigned' > > i.e., IMO, IANA should list these as "unauthorized use", > as a service to the community to help those using those > ports as assigned. > > I would expect the draft might address both issues. > > Joe > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) > > iEYEARECAAYFAktXHUgACgkQE5f5cImnZrur0wCgrEKpARNefyRROwqpZSLeS39H > JlYAoPcevBtqqK0fW4kmR41xVKPqATm8 > =VHin > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
