On 27 Jul 2011, at 07:33, S Moonesamy wrote: > The YAM working group has been on hiatus for the past year because of the > two-track proposal. Tony asked the following question during the IETF 81 YAM > session : > > - The two-track hasn't been adopted; should we continue to wait? > - or do we just shut down? > > The sense of the room was to shut down the YAM working group. The decision > is being taken to the mailing list for confirmation.
Was there any discussion of what would happen in case it (two maturity levels) either drops out or occurs? I don't mind, anyway. We have already documented some of the changes needed for 5321BIS, and 5321 has taken the place of 2821. Cheers, Sabahattin _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
