>Was there any discussion of what would happen in case it (two
>maturity levels) either drops out or occurs?  I don't mind, anyway.
>We have already documented some of the changes needed for 5321BIS,
>and 5321 has taken the place of 2821.

There was.  The sense I got was that if two-levels definitively doesn't
happen, we could charter a son-of-YAM group, but we'll burn that bridge
if and when we come to it.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam

Reply via email to