Thanks for your help, Sangjin. Do you have any concern or problem after your testing? I'd like to merge it if you're okay.
I'll wait for your reply until today - after raising this issue to ML, we had a time longer than 1 week, I think it's time to merge. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Sangjin Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > We're also checking from the timeline service v.2 perspective (YARN-2928). > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi YARN developers, >> >> Could you check this thread? I think YARN web UI is affected by this >> change. >> >> Thanks, >> - Tsuyoshi >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:12 PM >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> >> Hi developers, >> >> We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's >> essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. >> >> One concern to merge this to trunk is incompatibility. After the >> release of Jersey 1.13, the root element whose content is empty >> collection is changed from null to empty object({}). Because of this >> problem, I’ve marked HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change. Is it >> acceptable for us? If it’s acceptable change in trunk, I’d like to >> merge it into trunk. >> >> Thanks, >> - Tsuyoshi >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
