Li Lu was looking into this. Li, were you able to take a look? Thanks, Sangjin
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your help, Sangjin. Do you have any concern or problem > after your testing? I'd like to merge it if you're okay. > > I'll wait for your reply until today - after raising this issue to ML, > we had a time longer than 1 week, I think it's time to merge. > > Thanks, > - Tsuyoshi > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Sangjin Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > We're also checking from the timeline service v.2 perspective > (YARN-2928). > > > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi YARN developers, > >> > >> Could you check this thread? I think YARN web UI is affected by this > >> change. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> - Tsuyoshi > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> From: Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> > >> Date: Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:12 PM > >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk > >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> Hi developers, > >> > >> We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's > >> essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. > >> > >> One concern to merge this to trunk is incompatibility. After the > >> release of Jersey 1.13, the root element whose content is empty > >> collection is changed from null to empty object({}). Because of this > >> problem, I’ve marked HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change. Is it > >> acceptable for us? If it’s acceptable change in trunk, I’d like to > >> merge it into trunk. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> - Tsuyoshi > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > >
