[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663493#comment-13663493
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-710:
-----------------------------------------
Sid, what would be 'relevant' Yarn records? I would say, this should be avail
for all records. I'm OK moving the write()/read() methods to another class,
RecordIOUtils?.
Mmhhh, or ... as this is highly coupled to the RecordFactory in use. Why not
have this in the RecordFactory as the current patch, and as part of YARN-711 a
public proxy class is put in place using the current RecordFactory? Then if you
use a different RecordFactory, things will work as expected.
> Add to ser/deser methods to RecordFactory
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-710
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: api
> Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
> Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Attachments: YARN-710.patch
>
>
> I order to do things like AMs failover and checkpointing I need to serialize
> app IDs, app attempt IDs, containers and/or IDs, resource requests, etc.
> Because we are wrapping/hiding the PB implementation from the APIs, we are
> hiding the built in PB ser/deser capabilities.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
