[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13664384#comment-13664384
]
Siddharth Seth commented on YARN-710:
-------------------------------------
bq. Regardless of that, the ser/deser mechanism provided in this patch should
do the real work for all records. Then it is matter of deciding for which ones
we want to expose the ser/deser capabilities proxying to record factory
implementation, right?
Agreed. This can be the internal (private) implementation for whatever the
public utility is that exposes ser/deser for various records. The internal
implementation could then be used by RMStateStore as well.
> Add to ser/deser methods to RecordFactory
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-710
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: api
> Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
> Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Attachments: YARN-710.patch
>
>
> I order to do things like AMs failover and checkpointing I need to serialize
> app IDs, app attempt IDs, containers and/or IDs, resource requests, etc.
> Because we are wrapping/hiding the PB implementation from the APIs, we are
> hiding the built in PB ser/deser capabilities.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
