[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15738612#comment-15738612
 ] 

Arun Suresh commented on YARN-5216:
-----------------------------------

bq. Otherwise, to achieve this behavior, we will need to have two 
implementations of each executor: one that kills containers and one that 
preempts.
My suggestion was based on discussions on YARN-5673, where they were discussing 
possibility of separate executables / dynamically loaded libraries. Given that 
the choice of Executor is itself a configurable property, wondering what the 
value is in exposing an additional config..

> Expose configurable preemption policy for OPPORTUNISTIC containers running on 
> the NM
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-5216
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5216
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: distributed-scheduling
>            Reporter: Arun Suresh
>            Assignee: Hitesh Sharma
>              Labels: oct16-hard
>         Attachments: YARN-5216-YARN-5972.001.patch, YARN5216.001.patch, 
> yarn5216.002.patch
>
>
> Currently, the default action taken by the QueuingContainerManager, 
> introduced in YARN-2883, when a GUARANTEED Container is scheduled on an NM 
> with OPPORTUNISTIC containers using up resources, is to KILL the running 
> OPPORTUNISTIC containers.
> This JIRA proposes to expose a configurable hook to allow the NM to take a 
> different action.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to