[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15840432#comment-15840432
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-5734:
----------------------------------
Hi [~jhung],
bq. With this in mind do you still think AdminService is the right place to put
the change configuration functionality?
I would still prefer to use AdminService, we can add different logic to check
ACLs inside AdminService. It is still better than adding them to
ClientRMService.
bq. If we make MutableConfigurationManager part of CS only, the
ClientRMService/AdminService still needs to access it somehow.
I think we can make AdminService to call CS directly (like adding a method to
CS like {{updateCSConfig}}), and inside CS we will check and reject the
request. Changing the global provide-class looks more risks to me, since all
YARN components are depended upon that. It's better to limit logics inside CS.
> OrgQueue for easy CapacityScheduler queue configuration management
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5734
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5734
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Min Shen
> Assignee: Min Shen
> Attachments: OrgQueue_API-Based_Config_Management_v1.pdf,
> OrgQueueAPI-BasedSchedulerConfigurationManagement_v2.pdf,
> OrgQueue_Design_v0.pdf, YARN-5734-YARN-5734.001.patch
>
>
> The current xml based configuration mechanism in CapacityScheduler makes it
> very inconvenient to apply any changes to the queue configurations. We saw 2
> main drawbacks in the file based configuration mechanism:
> # This makes it very inconvenient to automate queue configuration updates.
> For example, in our cluster setup, we leverage the queue mapping feature from
> YARN-2411 to route users to their dedicated organization queues. It could be
> extremely cumbersome to keep updating the config file to manage the very
> dynamic mapping between users to organizations.
> # Even a user has the admin permission on one specific queue, that user is
> unable to make any queue configuration changes to resize the subqueues,
> changing queue ACLs, or creating new queues. All these operations need to be
> performed in a centralized manner by the cluster administrators.
> With these current limitations, we realized the need of a more flexible
> configuration mechanism that allows queue configurations to be stored and
> managed more dynamically. We developed the feature internally at LinkedIn
> which introduces the concept of MutableConfigurationProvider. What it
> essentially does is to provide a set of configuration mutation APIs that
> allows queue configurations to be updated externally with a set of REST APIs.
> When performing the queue configuration changes, the queue ACLs will be
> honored, which means only queue administrators can make configuration changes
> to a given queue. MutableConfigurationProvider is implemented as a pluggable
> interface, and we have one implementation of this interface which is based on
> Derby embedded database.
> This feature has been deployed at LinkedIn's Hadoop cluster for a year now,
> and have gone through several iterations of gathering feedbacks from users
> and improving accordingly. With this feature, cluster administrators are able
> to automate lots of thequeue configuration management tasks, such as setting
> the queue capacities to adjust cluster resources between queues based on
> established resource consumption patterns, or managing updating the user to
> queue mappings. We have attached our design documentation with this ticket
> and would like to receive feedbacks from the community regarding how to best
> integrate it with the latest version of YARN.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
