[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15872667#comment-15872667
 ] 

Hudson commented on YARN-6193:
------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #11276 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/11276/])
YARN-6193. FairScheduler might not trigger preemption when using DRF. (kasha: 
rev dbbfcf74ab44d7bfdc805b63affd0defc57182b8)
* (edit) 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/FSAppAttempt.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/TestFairSchedulerPreemption.java


> FairScheduler might not trigger preemption when using DRF
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6193
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fairscheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: YARN-6193.000.patch, YARN-6193.001.patch, 
> YARN-6193.002.patch, YARN-6193.003.patch
>
>
> {{FSAppAttempt#canContainerBePreempted}} verifies preempting a container 
> doesn't lead to new starvation ({{Resources.fitsIn}}). When using DRF, this 
> leads to verifying both resources instead of just the dominant resource. 
> Ideally, the check should be based on policy. 
> Note that current implementation of 
> {{DominantResourceFairnessPolicy#checkIfUsageOverFairShare}} is broken. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to