[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022043#comment-16022043
]
Vrushali C commented on YARN-6047:
----------------------------------
Thanks [~rohithsharma] for the patch.
I am wondering if we might want to say "records" instead of "flows" in the
wording: "retrieve the next set of apps from the given fromid."
Specifically for lines like 823, 954, 1157, the records returned are not
actually flows but apps or entities. The fromid belongs to the flow, but it is
basically like a row key prefix, if I understand correctly.
At line 1299, there is:
{code}
If userid, flowname and flowrunid are not specified, we would have to fetch
flow context information based on cluster and appid while executing the query.
{code}
Can this be reworded to say who would have to fetch? We meaning ats will
automatically fetch it, is that right. May be we can say, if these parameters
are not specified, they will be retrieved based on cluster + app id and used to
look up the information.
> Documentation updates for TimelineService v2
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6047
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6047
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: documentation, timelineserver
> Reporter: Varun Saxena
> Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
> Labels: yarn-5355-merge-blocker
> Attachments: YARN-6047-YARN-5355.001.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
