[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16465323#comment-16465323
 ] 

Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7892:
-----------------------------------------

Hi [~sunilg],
{quote}NodeAttributeIDProto could be renamed to NodeAttributeKeyProto
{quote}
  IMHO , I would suggest to go ahead with ID itself as it stands for identifier 
and had modelled it similar to ATS API {{TimelineEntity.Identifier}} . We are 
using this as part of our API hence names it as NodeAttributeID. I think if 
required we can rename it to AttributeIdentifierProto but Key does not seem to 
imply that it identifies the Attribute uniquely.
{quote}Map<String, String> to be changed an object which could be returned to 
user. This will make apis more cleaner and easier to maintain
{quote}
As discussed offline will make the modifications to proto objects returned for 
the user facing api's  and will keep the NodeAttributeManager API as is.

 

> Revisit NodeAttribute class structure
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-7892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7892
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Naganarasimha G R
>            Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-7892-YARN-3409.001.patch, 
> YARN-7892-YARN-3409.002.patch, YARN-7892-YARN-3409.003.WIP.patch, 
> YARN-7892-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7892-YARN-3409.004.patch, 
> YARN-7892-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7892-YARN-3409.006.patch
>
>
> In the existing structure, we had kept the type and value along with the 
> attribute which would create confusion to the user to understand the APIs as 
> they would not be clear as to what needs to be sent for type and value while 
> fetching the mappings for node(s).
> As well as equals will not make sense when we compare only for prefix and 
> name where as values for them might be different.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to