[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16590489#comment-16590489
 ] 

Craig Condit commented on YARN-8638:
------------------------------------

bq. I think this is the correct way to go and is what we should follow for the 
pluggable runtimes as well. Using {{YARN_CONTAINER_RUNTIME_TYPE}} makes sense 
to me and I agree with your proposed approach.

Perfect. I will prep a new patch and get it uploaded.

As an aside, the javadoc warnings are stumping me. According to everything I 
can find, referencing constants in {{YarnConfiguration}} as we are in 
{\{\{@value\}}} tags should be legal (and in fact seems to work in IDEA), but 
fails when using the maven javadoc plugin. Since we seem to have several other 
occurrences in the same source files, I'm inclined to ignore the additional 
warning for now.


> Allow linux container runtimes to be pluggable
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-8638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8638
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Craig Condit
>            Assignee: Craig Condit
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: YARN-8638.001.patch, YARN-8638.002.patch
>
>
> YARN currently supports three different Linux container runtimes (default, 
> docker, and javasandbox). However, it would be relatively straightforward to 
> support arbitrary runtime implementations. This would enable easier 
> experimentation with new and emerging runtime technologies (runc, containerd, 
> etc.) without requiring a rebuild and redeployment of Hadoop. 
> This could be accomplished via a simple configuration change:
> {code:xml}
> <property>
>  <name>yarn.nodemanager.runtime.linux.allowed-runtimes</name>
>  <value>default,docker,experimental</value>
> </property>
>  
> <property>
>  <name>yarn.nodemanager.runtime.linux.experimental.class</name>
>  <value>com.somecompany.yarn.runtime.ExperimentalLinuxContainerRuntime</value>
> </property>{code}
>  
> In this example, {{yarn.nodemanager.runtime.linux.allowed-runtimes}} would 
> now allow arbitrary values. Additionally, 
> {{yarn.nodemanager.runtime.linux.\{RUNTIME_KEY}.class}} would indicate the 
> {{LinuxContainerRuntime}} implementation to instantiate. A no-argument 
> constructor should be sufficient, as {{LinuxContainerRuntime}} already 
> provides an {{initialize()}} method.
> {{DockerLinuxContainerRuntime.isDockerContainerRequested(Map<String, String> 
> env)}} and {{JavaSandboxLinuxContainerRuntime.isSandboxContainerRequested()}} 
> could be generalized to {{isRuntimeRequested(Map<String, String> env)}} and 
> added to the {{LinuxContainerRuntime}} interface. This would allow 
> {{DelegatingLinuxContainerRuntime}} to select an appropriate runtime based on 
> whether that runtime claimed ownership of the current container execution.
> For backwards compatibility, the existing values (default,docker,javasandbox) 
> would continue to be supported as-is. Under the current logic, the evaluation 
> order is javasandbox, docker, default (with default being chosen if no other 
> candidates are available). Under the new evaluation logic, pluggable runtimes 
> would be evaluated after docker and before default, in the order in which 
> they are defined in the allowed-runtimes list. This will change no behavior 
> on current clusters (as there would be no pluggable runtimes defined), and 
> preserves behavior with respect to ordering of existing runtimes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to