[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13848026#comment-13848026
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-1028:
-----------------------------------------------

Also, instead of a config YARN_MINICLUSTER_USE_RPC, why not indicate as part of 
constructor? I wish the other configs were also set like that.

TestRMFailover
 - verifyNodeManagerConnected() should perhaps move to MiniYARNCluster.
 - verifyClientConnection() is similar utility but for the client-service? Then 
we could move that too, and do it just by a getAppList or something instead of 
creating new apps.

> Add FailoverProxyProvider like capability to RMProxy
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1028
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1028
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Bikas Saha
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: yarn-1028-1.patch, yarn-1028-2.patch, yarn-1028-3.patch, 
> yarn-1028-4.patch, yarn-1028-5.patch, yarn-1028-6.patch, yarn-1028-7.patch, 
> yarn-1028-8.patch, yarn-1028-draft-cumulative.patch
>
>
> RMProxy layer currently abstracts RM discovery and implements it by looking 
> up service information from configuration. Motivated by HDFS and using 
> existing classes from Common, we can add failover proxy providers that may 
> provide RM discovery in extensible ways.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to