[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034637#comment-14034637
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-2052:
--------------------------------------
Basically, I agree with the approach. If we take the sequence-number approach,
we should define the behavior when sequence number overflows. One simple way is
to fallback to RM-restart implemented in YARN-128. After changing the
containerId/appId from integer to long, it'll happen very rarely. [~jianhe],
what do you think about the behavior?
> ContainerId creation after work preserving restart is broken
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2052
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2052
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: resourcemanager
> Reporter: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
> Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
> Attachments: YARN-2052.1.patch, YARN-2052.2.patch, YARN-2052.3.patch
>
>
> Container ids are made unique by using the app identifier and appending a
> monotonically increasing sequence number to it. Since container creation is a
> high churn activity the RM does not store the sequence number per app. So
> after restart it does not know what the new sequence number should be for new
> allocations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
