[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14055956#comment-14055956
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-2069:
----------------------------------
Hi [~sunilg],
I'm not sure what you meant, I found if there're reserved containers existed in
multiple apps within a queue, all of their reservation could be dropped if it
is still beyond limit.
{code}
+ Set<RMContainer> containers = preemptFrom(fc, clusterResource,
+ resourcesToClaimBackFromUser, skippedAMContainerlist,
+ skippedAMSize, null);
{code}
resourceToClaimBackFromUser will be different if app comes from different user.
> CS queue level preemption should respect user-limits
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Mayank Bansal
> Attachments: YARN-2069-trunk-1.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-2.patch,
> YARN-2069-trunk-3.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-4.patch
>
>
> This is different from (even if related to, and likely share code with)
> YARN-2113.
> YARN-2113 focuses on making sure that even if queue has its guaranteed
> capacity, it's individual users are treated in-line with their limits
> irrespective of when they join in.
> This JIRA is about respecting user-limits while preempting containers to
> balance queue capacities.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)