[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14151914#comment-14151914
]
Jian He commented on YARN-2613:
-------------------------------
bq. I think it is better to keep consistent to use int or long
good catch, I changed the one for RMProxy, but missed this.
bq. Do we have plan to get HADOOP-9576 in? If yes, shall we keep the todo
comments here?
I forgot my initial intent to add this comment. As now I followed
FailoverOnNetworkExceptionRetry for the exception-retry policy, I found maybe
we don't need to do this for now.
> NMClient doesn't have retries for supporting rolling-upgrades
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2613
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2613
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jian He
> Assignee: Jian He
> Attachments: YARN-2613.1.patch, YARN-2613.2.patch
>
>
> While NM is rolling upgrade, client should retry NM until it comes up. This
> jira is to add a NMProxy (similar to RMProxy) with retry implementation to
> support rolling upgrade.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
