[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14280176#comment-14280176
 ] 

Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-2990:
----------------------------------------

Discussed this with Sandy offline. We agreed on the following approach when 
assigning work from an app to a node:
# Consider the app's node-local requests for that node.
# If there are no node-local requests for the app (for any node in the 
cluster), or if the allowed locality level is rack-local or off-switch, 
consider the app's rack-local requests for that rack.
# If there are no node-local or rack-local requests (for any node or rack), or 
if the allowed locality level is off-switch, consider the app's off-switch 
requests. 

Attached is a patch (v0) that works for off-switch requests. I tested the patch 
both using the unit test and on a cluster, and there is no longer a delay to 
launch the AM container. 

To handle the rack-local requests, we should be able to differentiate between 
node and rack names in the data-structure that holds all the ResourceRequests. 
Or, we could keep counters when adding RRs and assigning containers. 

> FairScheduler's delay-scheduling always waits for node-local and rack-local 
> delays, even for off-rack-only requests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2990
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fairscheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: yarn-2990-0.patch, yarn-2990-test.patch
>
>
> Looking at the FairScheduler, it appears the node/rack locality delays are 
> used for all requests, even those that are only off-rack. 
> More details in comments. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to