[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14294092#comment-14294092
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on YARN-2980:
----------------------------------------
The only thing that concerns me is whether or not we should classify this
service beyond private. I think for now this is fine though and we can revisit
that later. Pending a re-run of the jenkins tests, I'm +1.
> Move health check script related functionality to hadoop-common
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2980
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ming Ma
> Assignee: Varun Saxena
> Attachments: YARN-2980.001.patch, YARN-2980.002.patch
>
>
> HDFS might want to leverage health check functionality available in YARN in
> both namenode https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7400 and datanode
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7441.
> We can move health check functionality including the protocol between hadoop
> daemons and health check script to hadoop-common. That will simplify the
> development and maintenance for both hadoop source code and health check
> script.
> Thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
