Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-2423:

Apologies for coming in late, but should we rewrite this to be inline with 
YARN-2928? Given YARN-2928, I don't see an immediate value in having the patch 
as is (with a new API that nobody uses in the interim) and then rewrite it once 
more for YARN-2928. I know considerable effort has been spent on this, but what 
do you folks think?

> TimelineClient should wrap all GET APIs to facilitate Java users
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-2423
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2423
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>         Attachments: YARN-2423.004.patch, YARN-2423.005.patch, 
> YARN-2423.006.patch, YARN-2423.007.patch, YARN-2423.patch, YARN-2423.patch, 
> YARN-2423.patch
> TimelineClient provides the Java method to put timeline entities. It's also 
> good to wrap over all GET APIs (both entity and domain), and deserialize the 
> json response into Java POJO objects.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to