[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14515135#comment-14515135
 ] 

Vrushali C commented on YARN-3411:
----------------------------------


Hi [~vinodkv]

bq. Can we make both the implementations use hBase-client from 0.98 
irrespective of what the server uses?

Yes, since hbase 1.0 is both on-wire and on-disk compatible with HBase 0.98.x, 
I believe we should be able to use the 0.98 client to write to a hbase 1.0 
cluster. But, that means we would still be using the 0.98 APIs in the timeline 
writer and would need code changes to move to 1.0 client. (My current patch 
uses the new 1.0 APIs). 

Using the 0.98.x client means we won’t be able to take advantage of the 1.0 
features which would really be useful in ATSv2.

thanks
Vrushali

> [Storage implementation] explore the native HBase write schema for storage
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3411
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>            Assignee: Vrushali C
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ATSv2BackendHBaseSchemaproposal.pdf, 
> YARN-3411.poc.2.txt, YARN-3411.poc.txt
>
>
> There is work that's in progress to implement the storage based on a Phoenix 
> schema (YARN-3134).
> In parallel, we would like to explore an implementation based on a native 
> HBase schema for the write path. Such a schema does not exclude using 
> Phoenix, especially for reads and offline queries.
> Once we have basic implementations of both options, we could evaluate them in 
> terms of performance, scalability, usability, etc. and make a call.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to