[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14516714#comment-14516714
]
Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-3547:
-----------------------------------
Thanks for pointing out the duplication, [~jlowe], and thanks for comment,
[~jlowe], [~leftnoteasy].
[~leftnoteasy], are we going to implement non-exclusive node labels support in
FairScheduler or is there any plan? If so, this problem can be solved
incidentally just like YARN-2176.
> FairScheduler: Apps that have no resource demand should not participate
> scheduling
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3547
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fairscheduler
> Reporter: Xianyin Xin
> Attachments: YARN-3547.001.patch
>
>
> At present, all of the 'running' apps participate the scheduling process,
> however, most of them may have no resource demand on a production cluster, as
> the app's status is running other than waiting for resource at the most of
> the app's lifetime. It's not a wise way we sort all the 'running' apps and
> try to fulfill them, especially on a large-scale cluster which has heavy
> scheduling load.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
