[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14680388#comment-14680388
]
Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-4025:
-----------------------------------
Thanks for the patch [~vrushalic]. I believe you need to rebase with the latest
from YARN-2928 (especially the last commit for YARN-3049).
This patch and YARN-3906 which I'm working on have several files that are
overlapping, and we need to decide the order in which these patches go in. I'm
open to either order. Thoughts?
> Deal with byte representations of Longs in writer code
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4025
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4025
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Reporter: Vrushali C
> Assignee: Vrushali C
> Attachments: YARN-4025-YARN-2928.001.patch
>
>
> Timestamps are being stored as Longs in hbase by the HBaseTimelineWriterImpl
> code. There seem to be some places in the code where there are conversions
> between Long to byte[] to String for easier argument passing between function
> calls. Then these values end up being converted back to byte[] while storing
> in hbase.
> It would be better to pass around byte[] or the Longs themselves as
> applicable.
> This may result in some api changes (store function) as well in adding a few
> more function calls like getColumnQualifier which accepts a pre-encoded byte
> array. It will be in addition to the existing api which accepts a String and
> the ColumnHelper to return a byte[] column name instead of a String one.
> Filing jira to track these changes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
