Vrushali C commented on YARN-4025:

Thanks [~sjlee0] and [~gtCarrera9]

I will rebase and generate a new patch.

bq. Regarding changing the character for the separator, is it causing a real 
bug? Do we really need to change it? Note that we want to update the table 
description javadoc too if we're going to change it.
I don't think it will cause a bug if used properly while reading. I think it 
may be better to use something that is not a wildcard character like * or ?. I 
can update the javadoc. Is there any concern with changing the separator? 

> Deal with byte representations of Longs in writer code
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-4025
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4025
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Vrushali C
>            Assignee: Vrushali C
>         Attachments: YARN-4025-YARN-2928.001.patch
> Timestamps are being stored as Longs in hbase by the HBaseTimelineWriterImpl 
> code. There seem to be some places in the code where there are conversions 
> between Long to byte[] to String for easier argument passing between function 
> calls. Then these values end up being converted back to byte[] while storing 
> in hbase. 
> It would be better to pass around byte[] or the Longs themselves  as 
> applicable. 
> This may result in some api changes (store function) as well in adding a few 
> more function calls like getColumnQualifier which accepts a pre-encoded byte 
> array. It will be in addition to the existing api which accepts a String and 
> the ColumnHelper to return a byte[] column name instead of a String one. 
> Filing jira to track these changes.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to