[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14680931#comment-14680931
]
Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-3906:
-----------------------------------
Thanks for the review. Yes, I tried to reduce the code size as much as possible
in both {{HBaseTimelineWriterImpl}} and {{HBaseTimelineReaderImpl}}, and this
should be pretty close what's achievable. There is still some redundancy but
it'd be difficult to remove.
Agreed on the overlap between YARN-4025. I also commented there on the need to
reconcile both changes. [~vrushalic], what are your thoughts in the order? If
this JIRA goes in first, then there are further changes needed to make it
happen. If we decide to do that, I can definitely work with you to make
necessary changes. If YARN-4025 gets committed first, I'd need to rebase this
one more time.
> split the application table from the entity table
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3906
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3906
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Affects Versions: YARN-2928
> Reporter: Sangjin Lee
> Assignee: Sangjin Lee
> Attachments: YARN-3906-YARN-2928.001.patch,
> YARN-3906-YARN-2928.002.patch, YARN-3906-YARN-2928.003.patch,
> YARN-3906-YARN-2928.004.patch, YARN-3906-YARN-2928.005.patch,
> YARN-3906-YARN-2928.006.patch, YARN-3906-YARN-2928.007.patch
>
>
> Per discussions on YARN-3815, we need to split the application entities from
> the main entity table into its own table (application).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
