[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045420#comment-15045420
]
Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4311:
-----------------------------------
{code}
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelDifferentHostSamePort:316->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelDifferentHostDifferentPort:327->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelSameHostDifferentPort:305->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>
Tests in error:
TestAMAuthorization.testUnauthorizedAccess:281 ? UnknownHost Invalid host
name...
TestAMAuthorization.testUnauthorizedAccess:281 ? UnknownHost Invalid host
name...
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancel:285->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:353
? NullPointer
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelWildcardAddress:294->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:353
? NullPointer
{code}
Unrelated test failures as from before. Checkstyle error may be something we
could ignore since it is on the number of lines in the YarnConfiguration file.
{code}
./hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/conf/YarnConfiguration.java:1:
File length is 2,321 lines (max allowed is 2,000).
{code}
[~jlowe] appreciate your review comments. Thanks a lot.
> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from
> decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.1
> Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Attachments: YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch,
> YARN-4311-v3.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and
> exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The
> tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not
> used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
