[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045420#comment-15045420
 ] 

Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4311:
-----------------------------------

{code}
 
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelDifferentHostSamePort:316->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
 expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>
  
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelDifferentHostDifferentPort:327->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
 expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>
  
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelSameHostDifferentPort:305->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:363
 expected:<getProxy> but was:<null>

Tests in error: 
  TestAMAuthorization.testUnauthorizedAccess:281 ? UnknownHost Invalid host 
name...
  TestAMAuthorization.testUnauthorizedAccess:281 ? UnknownHost Invalid host 
name...
  
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancel:285->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:353
 ? NullPointer
  
TestClientRMTokens.testShortCircuitRenewCancelWildcardAddress:294->checkShortCircuitRenewCancel:353
 ? NullPointer
{code}

Unrelated test failures as from before. Checkstyle error may be something we 
could ignore since it is on the number of lines in the YarnConfiguration file.
{code}
./hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/conf/YarnConfiguration.java:1:
 File length is 2,321 lines (max allowed is 2,000).
{code}

[~jlowe] appreciate your review comments. Thanks a lot.

> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from 
> decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>         Attachments: YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch, 
> YARN-4311-v3.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and 
> exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The 
> tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not 
> used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to