[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15213326#comment-15213326
]
Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4311:
-----------------------------------
Maven and javac failures are unrelated and coming from hdfs project.
{code}
symbol: class StripedBlockInfo
[ERROR] location: package org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol
[ERROR]
/testptch/hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/protocol/datatransfer/DataTransferProtocol.java:[212,26]
error: cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol: class StripedBlockInfo
[ERROR] location: interface DataTransferProtocol
[ERROR]
/testptch/hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/FileChecksumHelper.java:[31,38]
error: cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol: class StripedBlockInfo
{code}
ASF license warnings are also hdfs related.
Test failures are consistent, unrelated and known issues.
Thank you so much [~jlowe] for the review, requesting comments for the revised
patch. I have additionally added a log line at info level when the node is
removed from the inactive list to better track when nodes finally go away.
Should this be at debug level?
> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from
> decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.1
> Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Attachments: YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v10.patch,
> YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v12.patch,
> YARN-4311-v2.patch, YARN-4311-v3.patch, YARN-4311-v4.patch,
> YARN-4311-v5.patch, YARN-4311-v6.patch, YARN-4311-v7.patch,
> YARN-4311-v8.patch, YARN-4311-v9.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and
> exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The
> tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not
> used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
