[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kuhu Shukla updated YARN-4311:
------------------------------
Attachment: YARN-4311-v15.patch
Updated patch for addressing rebooted, lost NMs which adds logic to the Node
Removal Timer logic. Also added tests for the two and additional test to see if
Unhealthy nodes also follow the removal protocol.
> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from
> decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.1
> Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Attachments: YARN-4311-branch-2.7.001.patch,
> YARN-4311-branch-2.7.002.patch, YARN-4311-branch-2.7.003.patch,
> YARN-4311-branch-2.7.004.patch, YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v10.patch,
> YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v12.patch,
> YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v14.patch,
> YARN-4311-v15.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch, YARN-4311-v3.patch,
> YARN-4311-v4.patch, YARN-4311-v5.patch, YARN-4311-v6.patch,
> YARN-4311-v7.patch, YARN-4311-v8.patch, YARN-4311-v9.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and
> exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The
> tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not
> used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
