[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kuhu Shukla updated YARN-4311:
------------------------------
Attachment: YARN-4311-v18.patch
Correcting minute checkstyle nit in RMNode.java (removing public modifier).
{{TestContainerResourceUsage#testUsageAfterAMRestartWithMultipleContainers}}
failure is tracked through YARN-5024, although
{{testUsageAfterAMRestartKeepContainers}} also seems to be related. They fail
irrespective of the patch.
{{TestRMWebServicesNodes}} fails per YARN-4947 and is unrelated to this patch.
Other failures are long standing known test failures.
Findbugs warning is from EventDispatcher.java which is unrelated to this change
AFAIK.
{code}
Bug type DM_EXIT (click for details)
In class org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor
In method org.apache.hadoop.yarn.event.EventDispatcher$EventProcessor.run()
At EventDispatcher.java:[line 80]
{code}
> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from
> decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.1
> Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Attachments: YARN-4311-branch-2.7.001.patch,
> YARN-4311-branch-2.7.002.patch, YARN-4311-branch-2.7.003.patch,
> YARN-4311-branch-2.7.004.patch, YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v10.patch,
> YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v12.patch,
> YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v14.patch,
> YARN-4311-v15.patch, YARN-4311-v16.patch, YARN-4311-v17.patch,
> YARN-4311-v18.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch, YARN-4311-v3.patch,
> YARN-4311-v4.patch, YARN-4311-v5.patch, YARN-4311-v6.patch,
> YARN-4311-v7.patch, YARN-4311-v8.patch, YARN-4311-v9.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and
> exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The
> tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not
> used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
