[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15258302#comment-15258302
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-4308:
-------------------------------
Hi [~Naganarasimha]
Thank you for triggering jenkins. I have made a change in one test case to
cover this scenario. Earlier they were expecting -1 there. Do you feel we need
to have a case for -1 value for CPU and ensure that we skip it? Because we were
using mock framework and if I do not have the suggested change in the Mock
class, then it will skip all readings.
> ContainersAggregated CPU resource utilization reports negative usage in first
> few heartbeats
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: nodemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.7.1
> Reporter: Sunil G
> Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: 0001-YARN-4308.patch, 0002-YARN-4308.patch
>
>
> NodeManager reports ContainerAggregated CPU resource utilization as -ve value
> in first few heartbeats cycles. I added a new debug print and received below
> values from heartbeats.
> {noformat}
> INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:
> ContainersResource Utilization : CpuTrackerUsagePercent : -1.0
> INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:ContainersResource
> Utilization : CpuTrackerUsagePercent : 198.94598
> {noformat}
> Its better we send 0 as CPU usage rather than sending a negative values in
> heartbeats eventhough its happening in only first few heartbeats.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
