[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15260558#comment-15260558
 ] 

Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-4308:
----------------------------------------

There's already a debug log on a miss in the patch.

Even if right now the only time a negative value comes back is on the first 
report, that doesn't mean it won't change later.  My spider sense says that the 
chance of the reports going away permanently with no sign as to why is bad.  
We're talking about futures, though, so I'm willing to accept your assertion 
that this change can't possible create a customer support case, but I reserve 
the right to an I-told-you-so later if it does.

> ContainersAggregated CPU resource utilization reports negative usage in first 
> few heartbeats
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Sunil G
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>         Attachments: 0001-YARN-4308.patch, 0002-YARN-4308.patch
>
>
> NodeManager reports ContainerAggregated CPU resource utilization as -ve value 
> in first few heartbeats cycles. I added a new debug print and received below 
> values from heartbeats.
> {noformat}
> INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:
>  ContainersResource Utilization : CpuTrackerUsagePercent : -1.0 
> INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:ContainersResource
>  Utilization :  CpuTrackerUsagePercent : 198.94598
> {noformat}
> Its better we send 0 as CPU usage rather than sending a negative values in 
> heartbeats eventhough its happening in only first few heartbeats.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to