[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15289535#comment-15289535
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-2877:
----------------------------------

An additional note:

Junping and I investigated PB compatible cases when adding new fields to middle 
of a proto.

Let's say:
PB1Proto:
{code}
  optional int32 w = 1;  
  optional int32 x = 2;
  optional int32 z = 4;
{code} 

PB2Proto:
{code}
  optional int32 w = 1;  
  optional int32 x = 2;
  optional int32 y = 3;
  optional int32 z = 4;
{code}

PB2Proto can read PB1Proto without any issue.

So next time we should not update sequence of fields in trunk/branch-2, what we 
need to do is to make sure fields of protos across branches has same id.

> Extend YARN to support distributed scheduling
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2877
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Sriram Rao
>            Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos
>         Attachments: distributed-scheduling-design-doc_v1.pdf
>
>
> This is an umbrella JIRA that proposes to extend YARN to support distributed 
> scheduling.  Briefly, some of the motivations for distributed scheduling are 
> the following:
> 1. Improve cluster utilization by opportunistically executing tasks otherwise 
> idle resources on individual machines.
> 2. Reduce allocation latency.  Tasks where the scheduling time dominates 
> (i.e., task execution time is much less compared to the time required for 
> obtaining a container from the RM).
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to