[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15290572#comment-15290572
 ] 

Arun Suresh commented on YARN-2877:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for investigation [~leftnoteasy] and [~djp]

bq. So next time we should not update sequence of fields in trunk/branch-2, 
what we need to do is to make sure fields of protos across branches has same id.
Not sure if I understand correctly, are you proposing that we should NOT 
declare new fields in sequence ? for eg. if the last field index is 10 for a 
struct in trunk, if we want to add a new field, we should set it as something 
like 15 and not 11 ?

> Extend YARN to support distributed scheduling
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2877
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Sriram Rao
>            Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos
>         Attachments: distributed-scheduling-design-doc_v1.pdf
>
>
> This is an umbrella JIRA that proposes to extend YARN to support distributed 
> scheduling.  Briefly, some of the motivations for distributed scheduling are 
> the following:
> 1. Improve cluster utilization by opportunistically executing tasks otherwise 
> idle resources on individual machines.
> 2. Reduce allocation latency.  Tasks where the scheduling time dominates 
> (i.e., task execution time is much less compared to the time required for 
> obtaining a container from the RM).
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to