[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15511003#comment-15511003 ]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-3142: ---------------------------------- Thanks [~varun_saxena], Yes I understand that this will not have any meaningful performance gain, but we can optimize it later like adding fine-grained locks. This is first step to us. Generally the patch looks very good, only a few comments: *Lock is not requred:* {code} public Map<String, ResourceRequest> getResourceRequests( SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey) { // ... } {code} *Lock is required:* {code} public Resource getResource(SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey) { // ... } {code} (Imaging someone replace the request in another thread before returning) {code} transferStateFromPreviousAppSchedulingInfo {code} You may need to synchronize placesBlacklistedByApp and call placesBlacklistedByApp.addAll(appInfo.getBlackList()) to make it consistent to other blacklist-related operations. > Improve locks in AppSchedulingInfo > ---------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-3142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3142 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: resourcemanager, scheduler > Reporter: Wangda Tan > Assignee: Varun Saxena > Attachments: YARN-3142.01.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org