[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15522161#comment-15522161
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-2009:
-------------------------------
Thanks [~eepayne] for the detailed explanation.
bq.when it comes time for the intra-queue preemption policy to preempt
resources, it seems to me that the policy won't preempt enough resources.
Yes. I was also thinking on same line. If {{tq.used}} is less than
{{tq.guaranteed}}, then we may hit less preemption if we use
{{tq.guaranteed}}. Since *used* is less that *guaranteed*, there are enough
resources for this queue. So high priority apps will automatically gets those
resources by scheduler.
But after thinking more, there is one scenario. Adding to the same scenario,
assume another queue was over-utilizing resource, so current queue has to wait
till inter-queue preemption to kick in. (If inter-queue preemption is turned
off, then current queue may not get those resources immediately. In such cases,
I think we need to use {{tq.used}}. I would like hear thoughts on this point.
[~eepayne] and [~leftnoteasy]. pls share your thoughts.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Devaraj K
> Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
