[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--------------------------
Attachment: YARN-2009.0010.patch
Attaching a new patch in which I am trying to avoid the new api which was added
to FicaSchedulerApp to get real am used resources. This can be handled in
preemption policy itself if we consider only running apps. [~eepayne]
[~leftnoteasy] please help to review.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Devaraj K
> Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch,
> YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch,
> YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
