[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15611189#comment-15611189
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-2009:
-------------------------------
Hi [~eepayne] and [~leftnoteasy]
I am also inline with Wangda's thought. I kind of feel that fundamentally basic
cases are running fine. And free resources are handled by surgical preemption
feature. And as discussed earlier, we are coming with dead zone,
natural-termination-factor etc in next patch. So it can help us to avoid some
edge case over preemptions if any.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Devaraj K
> Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch,
> YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch,
> YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch,
> YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch,
> YARN-2009.0015.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
