On Thursday, August 25, 2011 08:44:08 am Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > On Thursday 25 of August 2011 14:29:52 Thomas Goettlicher wrote: > > On Thursday, August 25, 2011 01:52:27 pm Josef Reidinger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > second question related to yast++. What license we should use? As I > > > plan to create initial package, I need specify license ( and packaging > > > tasks include explicit license checker ). What suggestion do you have? > > > MIT, BSD or some kind of GPL? > > > Josef > > > > I talked to our licenses expert and want to summarize the outcome of the > > discussion: There are a lot of different possibilities and GPL v3 fits > > well for yast++. Libraries could be LGPL v3 if they are used by others. > > Otherwise GPL v3 is also appropriate. > > Do we want others to use our framework libraries and do not open the code? LGPL might help to distribute yast++ among different system. Anyways I think GPLv3 should be sufficient.
BTW: Your time settings seems to be wrong. Is your workstation's clock correct? Cheers, Thomas > > Stano -- Thomas Goettlicher SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
