Thomas Goettlicher write: > On Thursday, August 25, 2011 08:44:08 am Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > > On Thursday 25 of August 2011 14:29:52 Thomas Goettlicher wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2011 01:52:27 pm Josef Reidinger wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > second question related to yast++. What license we should use? As I > > > > plan to create initial package, I need specify license ( and packaging > > > > tasks include explicit license checker ). What suggestion do you have? > > > > MIT, BSD or some kind of GPL? > > > > Josef > > > > > > I talked to our licenses expert and want to summarize the outcome of the > > > discussion: There are a lot of different possibilities and GPL v3 fits > > > well for yast++. Libraries could be LGPL v3 if they are used by others. > > > Otherwise GPL v3 is also appropriate. > > > > Do we want others to use our framework libraries and do not open the code? > LGPL might help to distribute yast++ among different system. Anyways I think > GPLv3 should be sufficient. > > BTW: Your time settings seems to be wrong. Is your workstation's clock > correct? > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > > > Stano > >
Because both agents and yast++ libraries will be libraries which will be fine if use our customers for theirs solutions I found LGPL useful license. I try to discuss it on monday with jsrain and decide some license ( as long as we don't have external contributor we can freely change license ). I want initial version to create initial package for introduction and testing. Josef -- Josef Reidinger Appliance Toolkit team maintaining parts of webyast and SLMS author of rubygems - studio_api and net_observer (coauthor) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
