Sthembewena

Surely you jest. If you are not aware that under the
popular leadership of the former president, which I do not
contest, a lot of things went wrong.

Even though the former president was a popular choice these
are the things which went wrong during his tenure in
office:

•     The NEC of the ANC had its functions expanded to
include rubbishing sessions of certain leaders of the ANC
and then leaders of the Alliance. To be precise individuals
who were rubbished in NEC meetings were Cde Mandela, Cde
Zuma and the former president of COSATU. I may have left
other names out here. I guess the campaign of terrorising
the former president of COSATU has worked as he is now
working openly with anti-democrats as embodied in the
Shikota farce of a movement.
•     The ANC under its former president allowed a
reactionary culture of advancing bourgeois interests to
dominate discourse within ANC structures. People who raised
issues affecting the workers and the poor were belittled
and ridiculed and silly comments and malicious lies spread
about them through the media. The victims of this were
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela,  Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma,
Tokyo Sexwale, Cyril Ramaphosa, Matthews Phosa, Blade
Nzimande, Zweli Mkhize etc. We had people in the NEC who
were not ashamed to use the collective funds of public
servants to buy stakes (with the former president’s
approval according to media reports) in Telkom which was a
public entity. Note:  PIC manages the investment of public
servants’ pension funds and any use thereof should be
sanctioned by those public servants. In this case it is
clear that this consultation was not done in order to allow
the self interest of selected NEC members to supercede the
interests of the working class and the poor.
•     The privatisation of sections of state enterprises
which thrived in the post-GEAR years has not benefited
anyone except those individuals who were singled out to get
shares in the privatised entities. As you know, the
privatisation of water and electricity made it more
inaccessible to poor people. The privatisation of sections
of SAA and Telkom resulted in massive job losses in those
sectors. 
•     Under the former president we had cuts in public
spending which resulted in no funding for the extension of
public services, no improvement of the public
infrastructure against a population that was not only
growing; but was becoming more impoverished as a result of
the GEAR policies which allowed job insecurity and
inadequate access to social services. This has resulted in
interrupted supplies of electricity, water and rail
transport. This has affected the economy much more as
industries are relying more and more on road transport for
the movement of goods as opposed to the rail infrastructure
which is currently rotting.
•     Under the former president there were unprecedented
growths in the economy BUT there was no commensurate
improvement in the improvement of the standards of living
for the majority of the people. Other families lost their
middle class status and sank into poverty as a result of
the rationalisation and redeployment policies. At the same
time there was a widening of the salary gap between the
working class (working poor) and the top echelons of
business management. The policy of the state of separating
the fora in which the salaries of public servants is
discussed in the PSCBC and those of senior management and
public representatives being the subject of a special
Moseneke Commission is a recipe for widening this gap in
the public service. The appearance of independence of the
Commission is not fooling anyone.
•     Under the former president we had a beautiful policy
for rural development, but it was sabotaged by inadequate
funding for land reform and by lack of a dedicated fund for
comprehensive rural development projects. Adopting the
reactionary and prohibitive GEAR policy two years after the
collapse of apartheid was the most myopic development of
our times. We will pay for that foolishness for decades to
come, because if the state had been more expansionary at
that time, we propbably could afford to begin the
belt-tightening exercise now in response to the current
global meltdown or alternatively we would be better
insulated against it as compared to what we have now. 
•     The other myopic position that we lived with was a
waffled-through industrial policy that was short-sighted in
the sense that it did not allow for the development of
productive industries. It, instead, allowed the opposite
where we had closures of productive industries to a point
where we now have a very miniscule manufacturing industry.
Do not forget that each time there is a contraction in this
sector, there are more people laid off.
•     The relaxation of tariffs and exchange controls (part
of the GEAR policy) meant that our industries were under
attack from cheaper goods from the East and could not
sustain themselves. This too resulted in job losses and
more poverty and more dependence on the kleptocratic state.
•     Under the former president there was a growth of
corruption in the state: in housing, child maintenance
grants, disability grants, old age pensions, tender system,
licences etc. There was no even treatment of corruption
cases e.g. in the Eastern Cape where money disappears by
the millions, we have not heard of any arrests. There was
an irregularity on the school feeding scheme and no action
has been taken as yet.
•     Under the former president we had a sacrifice of public
interest development to the greed of the emerging parasitic
black bourgeoisie. Instead of utilising state funds to
expand public transport and to upgrade the transport
infrastructure we are taking billions to reward our friends
who got us Zuma on the dock through the Gautrain. Hands up
if you will be able to afford to ride on that train after
the World Cup hordes have left. Again, instead of upgrading
the rotting and inadequate electricity infrastructure we
come up with something called the Pebble Bed Modular
Reactor to generate electricity. Those in the know indicate
that nuclear energy is exceedingly dangerous, google
Chenorbyl. Pray nothing goes wrong at the nuclear energy
plant. On top of that it is not labour intensive, so very
few jobs will be created by the PBMR. Our friend in high
places have shares in this disaster waiting to happen. In
other words we continue to build white elephants and waste
valuable resources with not-so-well-thought-out ideas to
benefit our greedy, grabbing friends. 
•     Under the former president we had the worst denialism
of the link between HIV and AIDS in our time. Before you
say when I will quote his words,� Does a virus cause a
syndrome?� What do you understand by that question? My
understanding is that a virus (HV) does not cause a
syndrome (AIDS). As a result we took more time debating
ARVs instead of distributing them. Do not forget that all
these people dying of AIDS were really messing with our
balance sheet. We’d rather see the money (surplus) grow
in our bank account than use it to benefit our people. 
•     Under the former president we got the “ARMS DEAL�.
You should know by now that the Germans and the English
found corruption in that deal. Not our former pres. He
argued that there were no irregularities. On the same
breath another person, who was not in National Government
at the time, is facing corruption charges linked to the
arms deal. If there was corruption in the arms deal, who
stood to influence more and gain more: a member of the
tender committee or some arbitrary provincial MEC? Before
you say other charges have been added to the charge sheet,
let me ask you, doesn’t that show that the NPA is really
reaching; because they know they don’t have a case. The
NPA is playing darts with Zuma’s life.
•     Under the former pres the voting members of the ANC
handed their power over to him on a platter in Mafikeng. If
my memory serves me well that is exactly the kind of thing
that Harry Gwala fought against in the ANC Conference held
in Westville. He argued that political power must not be
handed over to the elite of the ANC, but as soon as he was
dead that is what the ANC did in Mafikeng, willingly. Is
that your idea of democracy? Have you never had of the
saying “power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts
absolutely�? That is what the ANC did willingly, gave the
former pres absolute power. Polokwane was democratic,
because it sought to correct the wrongs of Mafikeng. It put
in place checks and balances to ensure that even the
current crop of leadership is held to account by the
majority, instead of listening to the unfettered voices in
their heads.
•     To me you are the one who thinks the ANC is “a dating
service where you can chose (sic) your personal preference
to be the president of the organisation�. The ANC spoke
in Polokwane “finish and klaar� Get with the programme!
It’s either you are with the anti-democratic Shikotas who
are crying over spilt milk or you are in the trenches
working for a 70% majority vote for the African National
Congress. 

Whatever you say my brother, history will not judge the
former president harshly, but it will judge all of us
harshly; because we were here and we are still here and all
these  things are happening.

I am always open to education, but you must remember that
education is a two-way process. The fact that you are and
educator does not mean you can’t learn from your
students. I am available for the next class sir!

Aluta Continua! 


On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
 sithembewena tsembeyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> it surely state that you even got the??rong end of the
> stick and sure that is kee to see it in the wrong blood
> that is running though your blood I just hope by any
> mIstake you are not related to the GS of the SACP course
> the little knoledge that you assume you have is surely an
> impirialst propaganda of thought and couse I love this
> country I offer my services for free to teach you of the
> proccess of democracy and chooises done by masses and in
> hope that your understanding of selfcenterednes is not
> extrimly grown over a day I promise you you have indeedly
> failed yourself by insulting the choises that where done
> by the public, I truly can base your thoughts of
> discrediting JZ or Vuvuzela, Hey this is not a dating
> service where you can chose your personal preference to
> be the president of the organisation nevermind the
> country so a fair worning to you my dear you have acted
> un-communist and surely you know nothing of greatness of
> this libaration who can
>  prevail you to understand revolution of this country
> please find a friend in US and do the country a favour
> LEAVE!!!
> --- On Thu, 10/30/08, Fundi Nzimande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> From: Fundi Nzimande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Zuma and Malema are
> polarising figures!
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 3:30 AM
> 
> Considering that TM started calling the shorts in 1996,
> it
> has been a very, very long 12 years.
>  
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:03:05 +0200 (SAST)
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > Why are Zuma and Malema such polarising figures. Would
> it
> > not be better
> > for the ANC to choose less controversial figures for
> next
> > year's
> > elections?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------
> > South Africas premier free email service -
> > www.webmail.co.za 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For super low premiums, click here
> > http://www.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> Fundi Nzimande
> Mphephethwa Projects cc
> (011) 646 6403
> Fx:(011) 646 6413
> 083 729 0212
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________________________________________________
> ?EAST RAND SECURITY EXPO NOW ON?
> 
> 
>
http://www.swiftsms.co.za/swiftT/track.asp?e=*em*&cid=113&u=8&tid=2011
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> > 

Fundi Nzimande
Mphephethwa Projects cc
(011) 646 6403
Fx:(011) 646 6413
083 729 0212


_______________________________________________________________________________________
“EAST RAND SECURITY EXPO NOW ON”


http://www.swiftsms.co.za/swiftT/track.asp?e=*em*&cid=113&u=8&tid=2011
 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] . You don't have to put anything 
in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. 
All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to