|
I am glad you came out comrade Vincent. I, also fully, agree with Cde Sabelo.
We need to be critical to ourselves without fear or favour. I fully agree that most of statements made by leaders of the mass democratic movement as led by the ANC are difficult to defend. Communists should be distinct from nationalists by analysis, by word and by action.
I do not agree with Cde Julius regarding the Quotas. The alliance is led by the ANC but is not the ANC. Decisions of the ANC are not the only decision that should bind others from the alliance. The Party and COSATU as independent structures held their congresses and made resolutions. Among the resolutions includes reconfigured alliance (Party) and the pact (COSATU).
Both these resolutions cannot be meaningless because the ANC did not resolve as such. The reasons regarding these pact approach or reconfigured alliance are there in the resolutions and the discussion papers by both the alliance components. I therefore do not believe that resolutions of the ANC should be the only reference in alliance meetings and programmes.
just a reminder, The party was the first to be banned under the suppression of communism act in 1950. The party went underground and its members swelled the ranks of the ANC. The ANC changed its character and became militant and defiant in the 1950s until it was banned under the same act in 1960.
It was not by mistake that it was banned under the same act. The freedom charter, crafted in 1955 in the congress of the people, and adopted in the ANC's 1959 congress, is socialist programme. After its banning, the ANC members were welcomed by the party members in exile. In essence, most ANC members were given scholarships and work by communists structures from various countries through the SACP.
The ANC was popularized by the SACP. It cannot be President Malema who should today dictate terms for the alliance. The alliance was configured and the alliance should be reconfigured. Communists in government should account to their organization (the party). This can only happen when the party (as well as COSATU) has an agreed quota in parliament accountable to it.
This will ensure that issues and policies are thoroughly discussed to prevent adoption of reactionary policies in parliament. All communist university mates agrees with me that the ANC alone in parliament delays socialism. Lastly, the land expropriation bill should be re-presented in parliament. land is an economic asset that will assist masses of our people to enter cooperatives that will ensure they survive from it.
lets engage the issues as raised.
>>> "Vincent Masoga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 19/11/2008 12:31 >>> Comrades wait a little here. I agree with cde Sabelo. At some point we are going to have to be critical of one another, not for point scoring or certain public humiliations. But for the sake of the very same revolution we are all on about. I think you comrades are just accusing comrade Sabelo for something you are equally not fully aware of. Irrespective of what the media says about Julius, of which i concure that the media is being opportunistic, Julius himself did say thing that as a young communist i do not agree upon and they are way too close to my heart for mo not to talk about.
When he publicly rejected the 30% quota proposal by the Party & YCL, we did not agree with him. He went even further to justify that argument with things we do not agree with him on. I also personally do beleive that if the media is in the business of villifying him, he should not fight them back, that way he would weaken them. It is also true that the kill statement had damaged our public image, i have felt that during the door to door and it is a reason used by some of the current defectors. I have no problem with what he raised in terms of the kill word, but i had a problem with how it was handled. period. I do not want to sound to be too defiant in rasing my personal view against views of the collective, but equally we should be careful of the culture of sychophancy.
Firstly as a YCL member and leader, i belive that we do have acute differences with the ANCYL and we should not hide them. But we will attempt to raise them in a principled manner.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Makhetha, Mzukisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This message and any attachments relating to official business of the Mpumalanga Provincial Government (MPG) is proprietary to the MPG and intended for the original addressee only. The message may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. If you receive this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in connection therewith. The MPG cannot insure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained, nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception and / or interference. The MPG is not liable whatsoever for loss or damage resulting from the opening of this message and / or attachments and / or the use of the information contained in this message and / or attachments. |
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Sabelo Gina NT Zwane
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Sabelo Gina Makhetha, Mzukisi
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Sabelo Gina Vincent Masoga
- [YCLSA Discussion] Sabelo Gina Mduduzi H Vilakazi
- [YCLSA Discussion] WHY are we so f... Masego Kupa
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: WHY ar... thabo . lekhu
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: WH... Moses Serobatse
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: WH... siphakanyiswa khanyile
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re... Phillip Shabalala
- [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Sabelo Gina sabelo gina
