Point of correction, Kaizer is not the acussed, but the acquited

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM, KGALE GODFREY MAILA <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Kaizer can you please post [attach] the judgement so that we make our own
> analysis apart from what you say. We are afraid of making misleading
> conclusions here, either for you the accused or the prosecution.
>
> Maila
>
> >>> [email protected] 10/08/09 9:29 AM >>>
>
> FREE AT LAST
>
> Thursday, October 08, 2009
>
> On Monday, 05 October Kaizer Mohau was found not guilty of all the
> charges presented before the court by the National Prosecution
> Authority. The charges followed an accident Kaizer Mohau was involved
> in, in February 2008.
>
> Mohau was charged with the following charges: 1. Culpable homicide due
> to the unfortunate dearth of a young boy, 2. Drunk and driving * and
> 3. Reckless driving.
>
> Since after the accident many in the media tried to create the
> impression that Mohau killed the young boy deliberately * this was
> shown through the manner in which the media reported on this matter.
> It was not only the media that played this anti * Mohau attitude, in
> fact some of our cadres in both the ANC and the City council played
> this role including to use the media in ensuring that Mohau's being is
> compromised.
>
> For starters it is a proved fact that some ANC Comrades leaked the
> wrong information to a certain SABC radio station * in which they
> claimed Mohau did not have a drivers license. The media did not even
> try to verify facts on this issue, it only went on to have a two an a
> half hours program to discuss the issue. The City council equally
> released public statements which they indicated that Mohau was not
> innocent of all the charges.
>
> It even went to an extend of using the City Council newsletter to
> inform the public that Mohau is not innocent.
>
> During the beginning of the trial * Mohau was suspended from his work
> without doing the suspension officially, but in an attempt to
> frustrate him all his responsibilities were taken to a newly appointed
> city council spokesperson * Despite having been promised that his
> responsibilities will be brought back following the finalization of
> both the court process and the internal hearing, Mohau continues to be
> subjected to total frustration without any explanation.
>
> It will be noted that this accident took place when the powerful
> faction * "Local" 1996 class project was in charge and it used the
> accident as an excuse to deal with Mohau and many others who did not
> agree with factionalism, that is the reason in our view that Mohau was
> subjected to this condition as a result of political differences.
>
> The fact that some of the disbanded Sub regional leadership of the ANC
> in Potchefstroom participated in helping the NPA and the police to
> organize witnesses and evidence which would ensured that Mohau is
> found guilty, it is a very dangerous fact and reality.
>
> Some of the witnesses indicated that they were visited and promised
> employment only when they give evidence against Mohau * by some
> leading cadres.
>
> These witnesses including their false evidence were lambasted by the
> magistrate who finally found Mohau not guilty, the magistrate went
> further to indicate that this accident matter was hijacked by evil
> politicians for political reasons and aims.
>
>
> Again just before the trial reached its final stage, leading cadres
> manipulated a certain Community radio and instructed them to report
> negatively about Mohau and the trial.
>
> For instance in more one instance * the radio station lied about
> Mohau. When the medical doctor gave evidence in court, she indicated
> that there exist a possibility that Mohau did not drink or used any
> anything that could have impacted negatively on his driving * the
> radio station chose to lie and say the Doctor said Mohau was drunk.
> Secondly, on the 17th of September 2009, after the magistrate
> dismissed two charges of Drunk and driving and reckless driving, the
> radio station said Mohau has been found guilty and will be sentenced
> on Monday, 05 October 2009 * contrary to that report Mohau was found
> not guilty and yet the radio station chose not to invite Mohau but
> invited Chris Hartting of the DA to the studio for an interview
> regarding the Mohau trial.
>
> It is in this context that our view regarding the disbandment of the
> Provincial, Regional and sub regional structures should not avoid the
> consideration of disbanding some of the municipalities. For instance
> in Potchefstroom majority of those who are serving in strategic
> positions in the municipality are part of the disbanded Sub regional
> structure. The point being that if reasons for the disbandment are due
> to problems encountered by ANC structures, that must include their
> corrupt and factional tendencies in relation to the municipality. We
> have argued that leading people in the municipality used their
> positions and government resources to advance their factionalist
> strategies.
>
> And therefore by not re-calling them means we are shall never be able
> to achieve our aim of building a strong ANC.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kaizer Mohau
>
>
>
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to