Counterpunch.png

 

 

Same Old Road to Hell

 

 

Joan Roelofs, Counterpunch, USA, 20 January 2014

 

The genesis for Nikolas Barry-Shaw and Dru Oja Jay's book, Paved with Good
Intentions: Canada's Development NGOs from Idealism to Imperialism (Fernwood
Publishing, 2012), was the discovery that Canadian development
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), even those considered progressive,
aided in the 2004 coup to overthrow Aristide in Haiti. They gave resources
to his opponents, and continued to demonize Aristide and his grassroots
movement, Lavalas. The authors, members of Haiti Action Montreal (linked
with Canada Haiti action network), were especially shocked at the stance of
Alternatives, a Montreal based group, and began to question the role of NGOs
in general.

 

Their first realization was that these organizations are not really
non-governmental. The major development NGOS, supposedly operating to bring
democracy and prosperity to poorer nations, normally receive half their
budget from the Canadian government, principally through the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA). Any significant amount from a
single donor (as opposed to genuine grassroots funding) leads to powerful
control over the activities of an organization. NGOs wishing to receive
funding could not criticize Canadian foreign policy; the radical groups of
the 1970s were defunded and the remaining ones were "increasingly in bed
with the government." The Canadian government in turn, despite its
(benevolent pacifistic social democratic) image amongst some in Canada and
elsewhere, cooperated with the United States, the European Union and the
United Nations, to install and support a murderous regime in Haiti. The CIDA
paid the salary of the new Deputy Justice Minister and the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police trained the police, which engaged in atrocities.

 

Among the NGOs the authors cite are Canada World Youth, Canadian Hunger
Foundation Partners in Rural Development, Oxfam Quebec, Development & Peace,
and Canadian University Service Overseas. They share with the Canadian
government an official ideology: the poor need resources. It is a technical
matter, not ideological or political.

 

The Canadian development NGOs are part of a worldwide explosion of the same.
Some were created to deal with the social costs of International Monetary
Fund rules. <http://www.imf.org/>  These promoted anti-poverty measures that
did not interfere with neo-liberalism, which entailed a rollback from social
welfare, end of subsidies of local industry and agriculture, privatization
of government services, and shrivelization of the civil service.

 

The universe of NGOs is now enormous. They have been sent by the West to
salvage nations torn by invasions, overthrows, and exploitation. In the
process they co-opt many members of the leadership class, drawing in both
government employees and activists from grassroots political and social
movements, as they pay high wages by local standards, and offer travel and
other benefits. The NGO as an agent of imperialism is not new-remember the
missionaries-but the scale is.

 

The authors report 10,000 NGOs in Haiti, providing 80% of the basic
services. Policies of the puppet government eliminating tariffs and
importing cheap food, along with food aid, helped to destroy the
agricultural economy. Peasants then migrated to the city, where there were
no jobs and built shoddy houses compounding the earthquake devastation.

 

Meanwhile, NGO cooptation through good jobs for educated people and
make-work jobs for the poor, false propaganda, and violent government
repression helped to devastate the Lavalas movement, originally inspired by
liberation theology.

 

Some NGOs (in Canada and elsewhere) are supported by concerned citizens.
However, most financing is from government agencies, such as the US Agency
for International Development and National Endowment for Democracy, Canadian
CIDA, and cognate institutions in most wealthy countries; foundations; the
European Union; and the UN. Even NATO funds development projects. The US
projection to the world, which blurs civilian and military, public and
private, overt and covert actions, humanitarianism and death squads, uses
development aid as one of the tools of the Special Operations Forces.
Especially in Afghanistan, NGOs are used to win "hearts and minds," and are
required to spy and not criticize "NATO" policy.

 

In most of the projects throughout the world, NGOs of the "North" emphasize
microcredit and microenterprise. These may create an informal economy as a
survival tactic, but do not promote sustainable economic growth or make a
nick on poverty. A current example is Bangladesh, full of NGOs and the
location of their shining star: Muhammad Yunus' and Ford Foundation's
Grameen Bank.

 

The authors contrast the idealism of the radical Canadian NGOs of the 1960s
and 1970s, solidarity groups supporting structural change in both rich and
poor countries and democratic participation by the poor, with current
government-funded development aid organizations, partners in neoliberalism.
The same phenomenon occurred in many wealthy countries, including the
"social democratic" ones.

 

They describe the dampening of the international anti-globalization
movement, which experienced a victory in 1998 with the defeat of the
Multilateral Agreement on Investment. To avoid such problems, People's
Summits, to parallel the World Trade Organization and similar conclaves,
were created by governments. The radical groups were excluded and the
"reasonable" ones let in; the protests were stabilized and little change
occurred.

 

Barry-Shaw and Jay conclude that "NGOs do more harm than good overall. While
providing small, temporary benefits to poor recipients . . . NGOs are
simultaneously an extension of the 'development' apparatus used subjugate
and exploit the Global South."

 

They call for a new solidarity activism to engage with anti-imperialist
movements and to educate their own countries (whose citizens tend to
venerate NGOs), about what is really going on in the aided nations. They
have "guarded optimism" that the Occupy Wall Street movement signals
"possibilities for a politics of common cause between the North and South."
Their website <http://www.pavedwithgoodintentions.ca/solidarity>  lists a
core of groups doing good work currently, but they wish for more concerted
efforts.

 

The book, a pleasure to read, provides excellent information about aid
groups in Haiti and elsewhere. It is especially welcome as it is rare to
find critical studies of this gigantic transformation of government and
resistance in the subjugated nations. One wishes that there were a large
research crew to investigate the connections between the universe of NGOs
and militarism and imperialism. Military contractor philanthropy
<http://www.counterpunch.org/roelofs01252006.html>  is one part of the
picture; the revolving door and interlocking directorates are others, e.g.,
Christopher Hansen was the American Association of Retired People's chief
lobbyist from 2003-2007. Before this he served as Boeing's chief
lobbyist-for 16 years, and before that 11 years as lobbyist for General
Dynamics. John H. Biggs was a director of Boeing while he was Chairman,
President and CEO of TIAA-CREF, the college teachers' retirement fund. So
much more could be unearthed; we need a Trojan Horse cavalry.

 

Another, not unrelated, large question this book raises is: what were all
the reasons for 1960s-1990s radicalism's demise? The problems have not
disappeared; they are apparently worse: militarism, endless aggressive wars,
every kind of ecological devastation and human rights violation.
Furthermore, we are much more aware of them. The internet makes it harder to
hide or propagandize with impunity; the political, liberal,
environmentalist, humanitarian, and activist types have adequate access to
this technology but are very quiet.

 

There is no doubt that government and foundation funding of organizations
has contributed considerably to the deradicalization of solidarity and
anti-capitalist movements. Foundation sponsored "multiculturalism" and
"identity politics" has likewise fractured comprehensive multi-issue groups.
Propaganda may be more effective today; perhaps people believe that "only
the US as superpower and the 'free market' can save us from the horrors of
this dangerous world."

 

However, there appears to be more reasons for quietism. Why are so few young
people joining together to save the world? Or perhaps not joining much for
anything? Some obvious guesses: jobs with contractors, electronic and other
distractions, student debt, high cost of living, drugs (legal and
otherwise), pessimism et al. A better understanding of the social and
personal psychology issues might help us to discover what is to be done. In
the meantime, "Paved with Good Intentions" is not only a fine source of
information, but might activate some to get moving before it is too late.

 

.        Joan Roelofs is Professor Emerita of Political Science, Keene State
College, New Hampshire. She is the translator of Victor Considerant's
Principles of Socialism
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0944624472/counterpunchmaga>
(Maisonneuve Press, 2006), and author of Foundations and Public Policy: The
Mask of Pluralism
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0791456420/counterpunchmaga>  (SUNY
Press, 2003) and Greening Cities
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0942850351/counterpunchmaga>
(Rowman and Littlefield, 1996). Web site: www.joanroelofs.wordpress.com
<http://www.joanroelofs.wordpress.com/>  On her site is the outline of an
adult education course on "The Military-Industrial Complex," with images,
citations, and links. Contact: [email protected]

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.png>>

Reply via email to